Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
1. The most detailed Dominion market analysis so far ( BIG ! ) - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Natasha Nikolaev on 25/07/2011 00:29:54 So are the russians done sh*tting on tech yet? I stopped watching for a few weeks and came back and saw it was in the 80s and nearly choked on my cheerios. Too bad I wasn't following it more,...
- by Natasha Nikolaev - at 2011.07.25 00:29:00
|
2. Following Candidates support removing T2 BPOs - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Natasha Nikolaev on 22/06/2011 00:02:41 nevermind
- by Natasha Nikolaev - at 2011.06.22 00:02:00
|
3. This should be the official MD speculation theme song - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Warrant - Dirty Rotten Filthy Stinking Rich obviously.
- by Natasha Nikolaev - at 2011.06.21 23:39:00
|
4. How do you increase your ISK invested in the market at one time? - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Natasha Nikolaev on 09/06/2011 23:14:57 Originally by: Elise DarkStar You do need to fight to get that first few billion. Your one advantage is that you are enjoying the market game and not completely bunrtout beyond the ab...
- by Natasha Nikolaev - at 2011.06.09 23:11:00
|
5. The most detailed Dominion market analysis so far ( BIG ! ) - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Natasha Nikolaev on 04/06/2011 06:38:10 Originally by: oniplE He does know, he says they dont know of any other reason apart from insufficient supply, which is basically what's going on. However, I very much doubt there's ...
- by Natasha Nikolaev - at 2011.06.04 06:34:00
|
6. The most detailed Dominion market analysis so far ( BIG ! ) - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Vaerah Vahrokha Originally by: Natasha Nikolaev I still wonder how they didn't know tech was going to do this. Even more confusing would be if they did. Either way, odd. If they did, would they say so? There's n...
- by Natasha Nikolaev - at 2011.05.24 00:07:00
|
7. The most detailed Dominion market analysis so far ( BIG ! ) - in Market Discussions [original thread]
I still wonder how they didn't know tech was going to do this. Even more confusing would be if they did. Either way, odd.
- by Natasha Nikolaev - at 2011.05.23 00:38:00
|
8. The most detailed Dominion market analysis so far ( BIG ! ) - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Elise DarkStar Then everyone with bigger balls than me can play chicken with each other and russian roulette with ccp. Too intense for my faint heart. Speaking of which...when this month is CSM6 summit actually happening?
- by Natasha Nikolaev - at 2011.05.20 16:25:00
|
9. The most detailed Dominion market analysis so far ( BIG ! ) - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Akita T Originally by: RAW23 Seems pretty steady at 75 now and if Akita would just move his 500k order up a bit ... Nu-uh, I like my EVE-Mon-based technetium price alert If wallet goes up much, tech just broke ...
- by Natasha Nikolaev - at 2011.01.23 01:08:00
|
10. Blasters lack a niche, what should their niche be? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Natasha Nikolaev on 29/12/2010 01:53:36 Originally by: Tulisin Dragonflame I'll accept that, despite how crappy rails are, they hold a niche of being able to have grid-length instant damage application, but: 1. Minmatar alre...
- by Natasha Nikolaev - at 2010.12.29 01:53:00
|
11. Feedback on Sansha Supercarrier - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Ghost Nightmare Call it the Night Terror, since most of the other sansha ships are named on seemingly progressive levels of bad dreams and a night terror is the one after nightmare, also it sounds *****in Or perhaps the ...
- by Natasha Nikolaev - at 2010.11.21 16:12:00
|
12. [WTB] Low SP 2003/2004 SP toon with an interesting name! - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Edited by: Natasha Nikolaev on 15/10/2010 03:35:26 http://eveboard.com/pilot/Natasha_Nikolaev
- by Natasha Nikolaev - at 2010.10.15 03:34:00
|
13. [WTB] Low SP 2003/2004 SP toon with an interesting name! - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Edited by: Natasha Nikolaev on 15/10/2010 03:02:39 Originally by: Reld II Originally by: Natasha Nikolaev Edited by: Natasha Nikolaev on 15/10/2010 02:47:41 not sure what you want as far as "interesting name" but she's a J...
- by Natasha Nikolaev - at 2010.10.15 03:00:00
|
14. [WTB] Low SP 2003/2004 SP toon with an interesting name! - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Edited by: Natasha Nikolaev on 15/10/2010 02:47:41 not sure what you want as far as "interesting name" but she's a July '03
- by Natasha Nikolaev - at 2010.10.15 02:46:00
|
15. Feedback on Rocket Changes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Captain Nares Btw merlin has moar eHP, same shield amount and higher EM/EX resists, but lower KIN/TERM. And it has comparable range with rockets and scorches... I'd prefer a Merlin to your Hawk, sorry. Out of curiosit...
- by Natasha Nikolaev - at 2010.10.14 23:09:00
|
16. Balancing - Identifying problems - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Natasha Nikolaev on 28/09/2010 02:57:15 Null needs to be balanced with scorch and barrage. currently "effective range" (opti + falloff) is boosted by 37.5% by scorch, 40% by barrage and 25% by null. Should be fairly obvious this isn...
- by Natasha Nikolaev - at 2010.09.28 02:54:00
|
17. Dreadnought vs smaller ships - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Natasha Nikolaev on 14/09/2010 15:35:47 pulse rev with drop booster and 2x TC2 can hit BS fairly well at range. I tested it a long time ago but don't remember exactly what range one needed to be at or beyond to hit well. Not in any ...
- by Natasha Nikolaev - at 2010.09.14 15:34:00
|
18. Super Carrier........ Proliferation - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
supercap build times need to be doubled (or even tripled), for starters. RR range bonus on SCs needs to be cut in half or possibly eliminated.
- by Natasha Nikolaev - at 2010.09.03 18:48:00
|
19. please fix Null - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Null is severely gimped compared to scorch and barrage and needs to be fixed. Scorch and barrage give a 37.5% and 40% bonus to "effective range" (opti + falloff), respectively. Null gives a pathetic 25%. Up null range bonuses to 37.5% on each on S...
- by Natasha Nikolaev - at 2010.09.03 18:29:00
|
20. Blaster Theory - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Sigras Originally by: Natasha Nikolaev Has anyone mentioned Null? Because Null is total sh*t. Null needs to be made 37.5/37.5 range bonus. scorch is effectively 37.5% bonus to "effective" range (opti+falloff) and bar...
- by Natasha Nikolaev - at 2010.09.02 14:59:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |